Re: Mobile Home
Please take note that in Mr. Holt?s illustration he used two buildings just as used in the illustrations used in the NEC handbook.
Not once have I saw a service mounted on a post or pole used in one of these illustrations by any one in the educational field.
Not one of those who disagree with me has addressed the working found in 550.32 as others as well as I have posted.
I am not trying to belittle any one just trying to get you to address those articles that have been posted instead of ignoring them. It seems to me that the continued referral to 250.32 instead of addressing 550.32 is as much an insult as any thing else that could take place.
An article has been put forth that I think over rides that found in 250.32 and it has been ignored. It is my belief that these post are correct and can not be dislodged due to the lack of those in disagreement not addressing them.
This all started on page one of this thread when it was first pointed out that 550.32 amends 250.32 by Haskindm and what kind of response has been given from that point on? Nothing except one or two who can?t see 550.32 for looking in 100 at the definition of structure.
Sixty five posts later and no one has addressed 550.32 (A) through (D) yet.
If you feel the need to drive the rod at the mobile home by all means grab a hammer and start pounding. I will make the statement that I think that it is a waste of time and energy.