Considering they are 58 feet in the air I imagine they are bolted to a large block of concrete already in intimate contact with the earth.Considering they are 58 feet in the air......
Someone better explain that to uffer.Originally posted by jimwalker:
Think about it Bob,concrete is not exactly a great conductor and if the pole got a direct hit would it not be better to try to let a rod take it than exsplode the concrete.
I don't know much about lightning protection but I thought that the use of air terminals (lightning rods) was to prevent lightning by changing the charge on the top of the object. I don't think that the purpose is to attract lightning.Putting up a rod to attract it seems somehow like a bad idea when you think of it that way.
Actually, the tip of the rod streams electrons into the air; the sharper the tip, the better it works.Originally posted by infinity:
I don't know much about lightning protection but I thought that the use of air terminals (lightning rods) was to prevent lightning by changing the charge on the top of the object. I don't think that the purpose is to attract lightning.Putting up a rod to attract it seems somehow like a bad idea when you think of it that way.
Take a look at part of 250.52(A)(3)Originally posted by justin:
I have a question about the continuity of a ufer. What about all those residential slbs that have a vapor barrier provided by a layer of plastic between the ground and concrete?
Justin, IMO what you describe is not a NEC 'uffer".250.52(A)(3) Concrete-Encased Electrode. An electrode encased by at least 50 mm (2 in.) of concrete, located within and near the bottom of a concrete foundation or footing that is in direct contact with the earth,........
Amen to that!Originally posted by haskindm:. . . but ALWAYS run an equipment grounding conductor!