I would pass it based on my own knowledge at this point anyway. If my employer didn't want such installs to pass, I would be asking questions at very least.Thank you. From your understanding of what I wrote, would you pass the job if you were inspecting it? (I would)
So Bob, how would you connect 2 pump cords and 3 float switch cords from this pit to a controller mounted above ground and adjacent to the pit, where you only have one 2" opening to exit the structure? You know, seals and such. My gut says you don't approve of the installation I described and I would love to understand the fallacy of my thinking if I am reading you correctly.One of the most commonly misunderstood concepts of electrical area classification is NEC Divisions are defined in terms of possibilities, rather than probabilities, [See Section 500.5 and read it carefully] This is a significant difference between the NEC Divisions and IEC Zones which are defined in terms of probability. (NEC Zones are a forced fit hybrid of the two systems with possibilities taking a stronger emphasis).
I have told people over the years, if they ignore my warnings, the odds may be in their favor BUT if they have a problem it will be a big one and they will have virtually no defense in an OHSA investigation. Of course, there is very little defense with OSHA in the first place, but it may make the difference in a fine or jail time.
NFPA 820 may be referred to (with great difficulty) here.C1D1 in the wetwell and if a vault with piping, meters, etc C1D2, if I remember and I no longer have a copy of 820
I generally try to avoid telling folks what to do specifically - it's like engineering DIY assistance. I try to refer to the appropriate Standards, NEC Articles, Sections, etc., and, if necessary, help to interpret them. It's always important to classify first [as required by Section 500.4(A)] THEN select the appropriate equipment and wiring methods.So Bob, how would you connect 2 pump cords and 3 float switch cords from this pit to a controller mounted above ground and adjacent to the pit, where you only have one 2" opening to exit the structure? You know, seals and such. My gut says you don't approve of the installation I described and I would love to understand the fallacy of my thinking if I am reading you correctly.
The classification is everything, especially the boundaries.Who classified your stations? Unless commercial or combined use drainage and sewer should be class 1 division 2.
Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
I agree boundaries are everything and I'll try not to step over any ol' sparky. New to the forum. This subject comes up ever 4 or 5 years. I never have quite understood why. The environment doesn't warrant it. 95 precent of the process is water. I know someone could dump gasoline in the wetwell but who could afford that. The largest concern is migration of corrosive vapors that reek havoc My recollection is NFPA classify's community station wetwells C1D2 and mixed flow stations C1D1. There rated submersible pumps with hard usage cables for removal without entering the wet well 501.140a 3. Across three county's we have used many different construction methods all of them allow easy removal of the pump cables. It seems the AHJ is being unreasonable. Not knowing anything about the assembly i would consider removal of the seal off and enter with listed cable glands 501.140 B4.The classification is everything, especially the boundaries.
It seems that (like Bob said) the people qualified to make these determinations are saying (like that old George Hamilton song) "if you don't know I ain't gonna tell you".
Because someone keeps running into a situation where x-proof seals are asked for or they have to change out a pump or float switch and run into an installation that has x-proof seals and they have to break it out.This subject comes up ever 4 or 5 years. I never have quite understood why.