pv source circuit wire sizing

Status
Not open for further replies.

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
The exception does not specify "or lack thereof where not required". It only refers to 100% continuous duty rated equipment with overcurrent devices.
The phrase "an assembly, together with its overcurrent device(s)" to me covers an assembly with 0 or more OCPD, and is not restricted to assemblies with 1 or more OCPD. At best it is ambiguous. But the physics supports my interpretation, as the 125% factor for continuous loads is only due to OCPD limitations.

Cheers, Wayne
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
The phrase "an assembly, together with its overcurrent device(s)" to me covers an assembly with 0 or more OCPD, and is not restricted to assemblies with 1 or more OCPD. At best it is ambiguous. But the physics supports my interpretation, as the 125% factor for continuous loads is only due to OCPD limitations.

Cheers, Wayne
This argument is moot. Most people use #10 PV wire for DC source circuits; even the 75 degree ampacity far exceeds what it needs to be.
 

Zee

Senior Member
Location
CA
This argument is moot. Most people use #10 PV wire for DC source circuits; even the 75 degree ampacity far exceeds what it needs to be.
Sure, most use #10......and with 10A or less, it is more than adequate. Regardless which algorithm is used, #10 is fine usually.

At the same time, it is fair to say we discuss some of the less obvious situations here.
Including:
1. #12 is used at times (I have seen 9 @ #12 wires in a 1/2" EMT). (so 8 @ CCC's in a raceway is also a major derate factor)
2. Combining two PV strings into one is fairly common..... not to mention three! Now we are talking 20A.... maybe 30A.
3. At times there are significant "# of CCC's in a raceway" derate factors to apply and /or ambient temp. derates..... as much as 50%.
4. We now have PV mods over 10A, and more....soon enough we will need to re-consider whether #10 is enough in some cases, even for a single string.
E.g. opti strings are already at 15A.
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
Sure, most use #10......and with 10A or less, it is more than adequate. Regardless which algorithm is used, #10 is fine usually.

At the same time, it is fair to say we discuss some of the less obvious situations here.
Including:
1. #12 is used at times (I have seen 9 @ #12 wires in a 1/2" EMT). (so 8 @ CCC's in a raceway is also a major derate factor)
2. Combining two PV strings into one is fairly common..... not to mention three! Now we are talking 20A.... maybe 30A.
3. At times there are significant "# of CCC's in a raceway" derate factors to apply and /or ambient temp. derates..... as much as 50%.
4. We now have PV mods over 10A, and more....soon enough we will need to re-consider whether #10 is enough in some cases, even for a single string.
E.g. opti strings are already at 15A.
Well, OK, but what I use always works. For a given wire size I derate the 90 degree ampacity for conditions of use (ambient temp and conduit fill), I derate the 75 degree ampacity for continuous use (yeah, I know, but X 1.25 is the same as divide by 0.8), and both results have to be > 1.25 X Isc. There may be fringe cases where this is more conservative than it needs to be but it always errs to the side of caution and 95% of the time #10 is plenty big. I do the math and move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zee

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
This is the difference between an exam question and the real world. An exam will ask what the smallest wire is that I can use in a given situation while in the real world the question is whether I can use the buttload of #10 I have in the truck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top