Proposals Due November 7th

[George Stolz]

Zero. And I'm strangely at ease with that.

 

[tom baker]

I did ten. I have one to Article 110, about labeling of the circuit source, a new section to 110.21(B). I understand its tough to get a change to 110.
Other than that, some changes to make the language in one section the same as another, add sealing requirements to 300.5(G).
I do like the new process, and I suspect for the CMPs it will be easier to manage the public inputs

 

[Smart $]

...
I do like the new process, and I suspect for the CMPs it will be easier to manage the public inputs

I'm wondering if there is a significant change in the number of proposed changes submitted...??? A substantial increase may counter the benefits on their end.

 

[infinity]

I'm guessing that the number attached to the public input is the sequential proposal number. The last one that I posted was less than 24 prior to the deadline and it was number 4314.

Subject:	Public Input 4314 submitted for document 70-2014
Date:	11/6/2014 7:11:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time

 

[Smart $]

I'm guessing that the number attached to the public input is the sequential proposal number. The last one that I posted was less than 24 prior to the deadline and it was number 4314.

Don posted #4435 (http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=165791&p=1609323#post1609323).

Does that tally include ones sent in by mail?

Anyone have any idea how many were submitted last cycle?