gerry
Member
- Location
- New Jersey
Can anyone explain why conduit is not the size it says it is and how this came to be? Thanks,just curious.
I think it comes from the early expectation that nobody would need a wire bigger than such-and-such, so you don?t have to worry about needing too many wire sizes. Then we build bigger stuff and needed bigger wires. If a #8 is bigger than a #10, and if a #6 is bigger than a #8, then what can you do when you want to build something bigger than #1? You go to ?0,? of course. But what about a bigger wire? That led to the 00, the 000, and the 0000. I suppose they could have named the 250 MCM as a 5/0, and kept up that convention. But someone said enough is enough.Originally posted by tom baker: And what is that 00 or 0000 size about anyway?