Motor Issues?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Moving less water is moving less water, either by putting less water in or restricting how much water can get out, but it's better to do it on the outlet so you don't starve the pump for water. Also, you don't get an infinite amount of adjustment just by turning a valve as the pump curve chart posted shows.

The thing I don't understand is how you have a submersible pump that has a valve on the inlet. They sit under water, usually in a pond or a well casing full of water.

View attachment 14806

Like this but smaller scale
it sounds like a submersible mounted in a dry pit
suction line with isolation valve

agree
never restrict suction side
it's an isolation valve and not suitable for throttling

we installed like this often
if the pit flooded, ie, broken pipe, pump failure, etc, the pumps were salvagable
 
Last edited:

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Last edited:

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
I think I see what you are saying now. Those pumps would be safe and operable if they were submerged, no? But they don't look like they live underwater which is what I would call a submersible pump.

Exactly
a submersible mntd in a dry pit adjacent to the wet well
i used them alot

the same pump can be mntd on slide rails in a wet well and hoisted out for service
 

topgone

Senior Member
The thing I don't understand is how you have a submersible pump that has a valve on the inlet. They sit under water, usually in a pond or a well casing full of water.
I think the same way too here. When I did a fountain install once, it took us lots of pump changes because the designer wanted this high of spout, that wide a discharge and most of all, the only adjustment available for us was the nozzle size and type!
 

Jraef

Moderator, OTD
Staff member
Location
San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
To update everything...turns out these motors are rewindable submersible 30hp 460v...they run at 51A FLA 53 Max. Problem is that the system was designed for an encapsulated submersible, same size/voltage with an FLA of 40A. The 10-11A difference is creating problems with the wire, breakers, etc. I recomended that they reduce the flow by slightly closing the valve on the floating fountain. There is a ball valve but i am not sure if it is before or after the motor/pump - I am curious if that would matter. When I recomended that the response was that they tried that and it increased the amperage. Does the position of the valve matter, or should they try to create more back pressure by adjusting the nozzle?? Ultimately I want to understand how to reduce the flow therefore reducing the work/amperage.
What this is sounding like now is that the fountain was designed without a good ME who understood the complexities of pump applications. They may have picked a pump by head height, likely to get some vertical effect in the fountain, without understanding the corresponding flow and that if the pump runs open channel, as it appears to be, it is overloading the motor. If it's not being overloaded, then as I said earlier, that pump motor is either incredibly inefficient, or has a very high service factor, which from my experience with submersibles is almost never the case.

I'd also take a wild guess that when they responded that they had tried turning down the valve and the amps went up, they were fibbing. They likely didn't even try it and are afraid to, so they are saying they did in order to avoid exposing their ignorance. Not that I think you should take on that responsibility as the EC either, in fact I suggest steering clear of that. Just stick to your guns and insist that a motor rated for 40A, running at 52-53A, is going to fail in short order. The nuisance tripping is not a "problem", it's a symptom and a warning. They need to get a hydraulics expert in there to straighten this out. Not your job...

And just to warn you, a pump vendor is not the right way to go with this. I've envountered some really idiotic pump vendors in my career who have zero clue, but possess the gift of gab and convince users that they know what they are talking about. I once had one tell an end user that he could replace a 400HP pump with a 100HP pump and get the same flow rate by using a VFD. I installed the VFD and got blamed for it not working, because the VFD couldn't keep up. I pointed out that the VFD was running at 100% speed, that's when I discovered that they had yanked out a 400HP pump. When I challenged the concept, the pump vendor told me to just run the pump at 240Hz!
 
Last edited:

jahilliard

Senior Member
15Hp 230V 3Ph.JPG [/ATTACH] 15Hp 230V 3Ph2.JPG 15Hp 230V 3Ph3.JPG
This fountain is obviously upside down, the head is sitting on the float to the left. The motor and pump are inside the large sleeve. There are bolts with angled steel suppporting the motor and pump. When it's in the water the sleeve is filled, the motor and pump are submerged in water forcing the water out the top through the head.
 

jahilliard

Senior Member
As you can see that one does not have a valve...the larger ones that we've been discussing have a valve in the smaller sleeve going to the head.
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
That looks like a vertical turbine pump
similar to the ones dropped down water wells

do you have the mfg/pn/impeller info/etc?
that will tell us alot

those pumps NEVER tolerate a suction side restriction
 

jahilliard

Senior Member
The ones in question are actually Shakti, 30hp, 460v, 3ph, rewindable submersible. You can access their manuals online with google I believe.
 
Location
NE (9.06 miles @5.9 Degrees from Winged Horses)
Occupation
EC - retired
That is basically an open discharge. Throttle it back, change heads, put the proper pump on (not horizontal)

That motor will also require a minimum flow of water past it to cool. The casing around it will help, but throttling back the flow may end up increasing the heat.

No win situation for you.
 

jahilliard

Senior Member
The Fountain company that built the ones we are discussing have decided to back off blaming the electrical once I talked to them about what's actually happened...the rewindable motors have thrown a variable in the system that could not have been accounted for without being given the proper information on those specific motors/pumps. I am more than familiar with this Fountain company, new owners as of March 1st have at least been open to feedback from our side....
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Without a pn hard to pin the model down
but looking at their catalog it looks like a vert turb
they are pretty much linear with flow/power/head over a given range
in other words throttling flow does not reduce power much

sort of like a positive displacement
throttle it and it still pumps the same volume (for a given speed)
just requires more power to overcome the extra head

power hp = head x gpm x 8.34 /33000

if gpm stays the same but head goes up, so does power
a vert turb lies between the 2
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Numerous issues
nec for 30 hp 40a
mfgs data for these motors 50 nml and 55 max per their catalog
ol's are set too low
cb is marginal
not essy to change since the conductor size is constraining

the pumps seem too large
Without seeing the piping drawing all speculation

but assuming per pump
20 t hd loss piping
20 across nozzle oriface
need 20 residual for spray height
60 total
assume 20 nozzles at 10 gpm each

hp = 60 x 20 x 10 x 8.34 / 33000 = 3 h
assume poor pump eff of 40% 7.5 hp
even if estimates are off by 2 still only 15 hp

does not compute

throttling the pump back may help a bit, but it lioks like a hot mess
pump application / mech design issues
elec sizing/coord issues
 

JFletcher

Senior Member
Location
Williamsburg, VA
That looks like a vertical turbine pump
similar to the ones dropped down water wells

do you have the mfg/pn/impeller info/etc?
that will tell us alot

those pumps NEVER tolerate a suction side restriction

Bingo. Throttling the suction side usually winds up with cavitation and eventually a blown up pump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top