110.26(C)(2) ? 2011 NEC

Status
Not open for further replies.

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Retired Electrical Engineer
If an electrical room has one switchboard that meets the requirements (over 1200 amps and over 6 feet wide), and if I wish to apply sub article (a), do I only have to show an unobstructed path from that switchboard?s working space to the room?s only exit, or do I also have to show an unobstructed path from the working space of every other panel in the room to the room?s only exit?
 

texie

Senior Member
Location
Fort Collins, Colorado
Occupation
Electrician, Contractor, Inspector
If an electrical room has one switchboard that meets the requirements (over 1200 amps and over 6 feet wide), and if I wish to apply sub article (a), do I only have to show an unobstructed path from that switchboard?s working space to the room?s only exit, or do I also have to show an unobstructed path from the working space of every other panel in the room to the room?s only exit?

I just had this issue as well on a job recently. Applying the (a) or (b) exception has always been hard for me to apply without help. I have found the NEC Handbook has some pretty good figures and commentary to help apply these rules. See pages 58 and 59 in the 2011 version or pages 56 and 57 in the 2008 version.
 

Gregg Harris

Senior Member
Location
Virginia
Occupation
Electrical,HVAC, Technical Trainer
If an electrical room has one switchboard that meets the requirements (over 1200 amps and over 6 feet wide), and if I wish to apply sub article (a), do I only have to show an unobstructed path from that switchboard?s working space to the room?s only exit, or do I also have to show an unobstructed path from the working space of every other panel in the room to the room?s only exit?

I would interpret it to be from the work space of the 1200 amp equipment to the means of egress
 

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Retired Electrical Engineer
Another twist to this (rapidly developing) story: If I have a 2000 amp board that is just over 6 feet wide, and that has three vertical sections each of which is about 2 feet wide, does 110.26(C)(2)(a) require me to treat the working space in front of the left hand section as interfering with an unobstructed path between the working space of the right hand section and the door?
 

david luchini

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Engineer
Another twist to this (rapidly developing) story: If I have a 2000 amp board that is just over 6 feet wide, and that has three vertical sections each of which is about 2 feet wide, does 110.26(C)(2)(a) require me to treat the working space in front of the left hand section as interfering with an unobstructed path between the working space of the right hand section and the door?

I wouldn't consider each vertical section as having its own working space, I would consider the entire switchboard to have one working space.

Disirregardless of that, I don't see how working space could be considered an obstruction.
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
:thumbsup:
Looking at it another way, the duty to keep the working space free of obstructions does not mean that you cannot stand in it. Well for most people anyway. :)

Tapatalk!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top