Electrical Grounding of Metal Scaffolding

Status
Not open for further replies.

TVH

Senior Member
Please help resolve a controversal subject being raised on our Construction Site.

Should metal scaffolding be grounded as a foul weather precaution on Construction Sites (Ligntning)?
If so what are grounding specifications for the scaffolding? All I get is opinions and no hard facts or reference to a specification.
Appreciate.

TVH
 

hurk27

Senior Member
Please help resolve a controversial subject being raised on our Construction Site.

Should metal scaffolding be grounded as a foul weather precaution on Construction Sites (Lightning)?
If so what are grounding specifications for the scaffolding? All I get is opinions and no hard facts or reference to a specification.
Appreciate.

TVH

Well if the reason your are asking this question is for the protection of personal located on or close by this scaffolding then I would simply have to say that the grounding of the scaffolding would or could not prevent those who are on it from being injured or killed in the event of lightning striking it, the only preventive measure that would guarantee the safety of those workers is to be in a safe structure located out of the storm.

Lightning is a high frequency and high energy event and does not follow the fundamentals of DC current, and when we apply high frequency theory to the impedances of the grounding and even the metal of the scaffolding, we will find that even grounded there will be voltage gradients at different points that can cause harm to those who might be in this unlucky place, but not only is the voltage a problem, the heat from the strike will also cause those who are close enough to the point of attachment to be burned in a similar fashion as in a arc flash event, grounding the scaffolding would be one of the biggest false sense of protection I could think of in a case like this.

Any one who is working on open metal structures or in this case a scaffold should seek shelter at first sign of any lightning, I spent a major part of my careerer and 3 years at University of Florida studying lightning and I will say this, many do not understand how lightning does not follow the theories of low frequency/DC current, we have had threads on lighting striking a concrete bucket connected to a tower crane mounted to the side of a high rise building well grounded, the bucket was way below the high point of the building or crane and suspended by the crane cable yet the strike from what the report said was to the bucket killing a worker near the bucket, even with the fact that the crane, its cable, and the steel structure was all well above this bucket it still happened.

There have been many cases like this over the years, and yet miss guided people still think that grounding to earth is the holy grail to making everything safe, planes flying high above the earth are not grounded and have the same fate if they are in the path of a lightning bolt, it is not because something is grounded that lightning will strike it, it is the fact that this metal is in the path to earth at the time the charge in the cloud reaches the break down voltage for the charge to flow through the air to earth, if this happens at the time the charge is over the place on earth you happen to be standing, it will take the shorter route through you or what ever else is in that route.

As per your question, I know of no requirement for grounding a scaffold, I feel it can do more harm if it leads workers to believe they will be safe to work on it in a storm.
 

Gold

Member
Location
US
Aside from lightning tho, If there is corded electrical equipment or tools being used on the scaffold and a possibility of a difference in potential between the scaffold and structure then IMO bonding the the scaffold and structure together to eliminate that difference may not be a bad idea.
 

hurk27

Senior Member
Aside from lightning tho, If there is corded electrical equipment or tools being used on the scaffold and a possibility of a difference in potential between the scaffold and structure then IMO bonding the the scaffold and structure together to eliminate that difference may not be a bad idea.

And using GFCI protected tools will also be a good idea and an OSHA requirement;)
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
I have had GCs have us bond scaffolding to the building steel.

I don't see how it can do harm and they paid us to do it.
 

BPoindexter

Inactive, Email Never Verified
Location
MT Vernon, WA
It is not required by OSHA or the NEC. Could not hurt anything as iwire mentioned. I have never seen it done but there are a lot of things I haven't seen :D
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
Bonding this for shock protection is still going to provide false security for people that do not know any better. GFCI protection is the thing that is most important, not grounding temporary structures.
 

G._S._Ohm

Senior Member
Location
DC area
Lightning is a high frequency and high energy event and does not follow the fundamentals of DC current
3 years at University of Florida studying lightning
A scope with a 350 Mhz bandwidth will have a ~1 nS risetime and using the same formula, if the risetime of a lightning strike is 10 uS the highest freq. contained in the waveform is 35 kHz.

FL and the Ozarks are lightning hotspots in the US.
 

hurk27

Senior Member
A scope with a 350 Mhz bandwidth will have a ~1 nS risetime and using the same formula, if the risetime of a lightning strike is 10 uS the highest freq. contained in the waveform is 35 kHz.

FL and the Ozarks are lightning hotspots in the US.

In case you want to do some reading on the subject here is a list of papers published on lightning from UFL

http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/general.html#2

It starts on the 2012 releases but they are not linked, but most from 2011 and earlier are

It is not uncommon to see .1uS and lower rise times with frequencys of 10 MHz and higher, although 1 to 10MHz is more common.

The wave front is differant from most waves, with the fast rise time and the long tail fall off, so most figure the 50% fall off as the point, although I think this is in error but that is my opinion, as I feel as soon as the voltage and or current crest the peak the frequancy starts to be determined.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top