stickboy1375
Senior Member
- Location
- Litchfield, CT
I design like you do, it's safe. But it's also more stringent than code requires.
It also costs someone more money on your design issue...
I design like you do, it's safe. But it's also more stringent than code requires.
After some of the things I've seen engineered, I know I'm not on the conservative side of the spectrum.
You should see the drawings I'm working from now. Resi job and way out of line. Bid to the prints, wire to the prints, not my call on that one.
Yes thank you dennis and stick boy....
I understand protecting the breaker at 80% of it's rating Unless the breaker is rated for 100%. My question was in concern to laying out the circuit relative to the 80 or 100%... So lay out the circuit for 100 %,
unless it's a continuos duty load then lay it out for 80 % unless it's a 100 % rated breaker then you could stick something else on it maybe to get to the 100%.....ha ha ha ha...
Thanks guys .......
I actually did a 600 amp feeder to some switchgear with a main breaker........upon mentioning about the 80% thing and the way their engineers designed the job, well they gave me the ok to switch out the internals of the breaker with
100% rated internals. The 80% internals are now a $600 paper weight in my shed.
Thanks again guys.
In residential, The only thing I consider continuous is an electric water heater, and electric heat.
What kind of breaker did you have where you can do that?